The Plain View Doctrine In The Police Force

With regards to plain view doctrine, in this instance police officers does not necessarily require a warrant in order for seizing an item considered to be in plain view suppose the officer is justifiably within the location whereby the contraband or the evidence was initially spotted (Guzzi, 2012).  However, the police officer is justified to seize an item suppose the item is easily viewed by the officer who is legitimately able to notice it, if the  detection of the evidence or contraband is unintended, and also if the officer with no extensive investigation, instantly notices the illegality state of the item (Guzzi, 2012). Nonetheless, the officer needs to have a probable cause in order to determine that the item is literally a contraband or an evidence for him or her to be justifiable to seize it. And suppose the police officer will need to use any kind of technology to investigate the item if it is legal or illegal, that is definately not a plain view and so the police officer is not justified to seize it, he or she will need to get an administrative warrant so as to seize it.

Plain view doctrine search basically is important and necessary during emergencies. During critical emergencies that need special attention, police officers are given authority to undertake warrantless search in a situation whereby the time period of securing a warrant for a jusdge would compromise public safety or even result in loss or damage of very important evidence (Hall, 2012). In such emergency situations, exercising plain view is necessary and the mandate of the police officer at that moment is protecting people and preserving evidence surpuses the warrant requirement.