Post-Discharge Infection In Patients Free Sample Essay

Post-discharge surgical site infections (SSI) for patients have been a serious cause of unhealthiness, expenditure, and anxiety. The barriers and plights that one undergoes while seeking post-discharge SSI care have affected the patients’ perception, which however has not been looked keenly into. It is identified that it is minimal or no follow up at all from the health professionals from the hospitals to attend to these patients (Daneman, Lu, & Redelmeier, 2010). Owing to these factors, patients are met with a lot of challenges which affect their capability to control wound complications resulting from post-discharge surgical which includes obtaining necessary knowledge and information for wound care from health providers, personal knowledge on self-care as well as effective consultation from physicians on the recovery process.

In fact, frustrations and gaps in follow up care to post-discharge outpatients have been on the rise which negatively affects clinical results and life’s quality. Failure of response in time by health professionals and unavailability of suitable devices that necessitates access constrains the post-discharge follow up procedure (Sanger et al., 2014). Inefficient follow-up and minimal or no post-discharge communication have led to poor results, for instance, readmission as indicated by recent studies.

A follow-up plan is very important in averting readmission after a patient has been discharged from the health centers. Provided the infections many times end in readmission, I believe it is essential to educate out-patients on the indicators of contaminations and the steps to take in the event of an occurrence. The follow up should involve regular calls made to the outpatients to check for any complications, ensure that correct prescription was made, assess patient’s condition and verify the patient’s appointment schedule is adhered to (Daneman et al., 2010). If the above conditions and process are followed, I believe that an effective follow-up plan will be achieved thus preventing further infection and readmission.

In redress to these issues, I would recommend the adoption and implementation of mPOWEr which is a wound monitoring application, which transitions the patients and providers care between hospitals and homes (Daneman et al., 2010). It acts as a risk factor screening device.  The mHealth (mobile health) functions to simplify the follow-up plan and make it easier to notice and control post-discharge infections. The noble cameras in phones as well as the reliable internet connection provide a good platform for clinical data accumulation and facilitate communication between the patient and the health provider. Technology has interested and equipped patients with the ability to manage their health (Sanger et al., 2014).  mHealth, in particular, has dealt with post-discharge constraints by enabling an efficient and convenient follow-up care hence reducing the patient’s anxiety cases and inappropriate readmissions.

It is apparent that SSI is a regular post-discharge complication resulting in readmission and reduced life quality. It is unfortunate to note that outpatients do not acquire the necessary basic post-discharge care, that there is an inadequate education, self-care of the wound at home, and appropriate communication with the health providers (Sanger et al., 2014). Therefore it is important to adopt an effective follow-up program. With this knowledge, I recommend the patient-centered mHealth device wound monitoring application (mPOWEr) in order to avert further complications and readmission. Both the patients and health providers need to make a feasibility study into such methods and techniques that seek to better the post-discharge follow up care.